<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Knowing where to find it</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kelleyeskridge.com/knowing-where-to-find-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kelleyeskridge.com/knowing-where-to-find-it/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 04:00:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelley</title>
		<link>http://www.kelleyeskridge.com/knowing-where-to-find-it/comment-page-1/#comment-6040</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 22:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kelleyeskridge.com/?p=768#comment-6040</guid>
		<description>Like you, I don&#039;t worry so much about whether Google has completely sliced, diced and cross-indexed me.  Perhaps when I&#039;m blogging regularly for &lt;a href=&quot;/./humans-at-work/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Humans At Work&lt;/a&gt; I&#039;ll worry more about it.  Or maybe not (grin).

I use online reference tools more and more these days, but if I want a deep look into a particular word, for example, I&#039;ll always go first to Nicola&#039;s Oxford English Dictionary.  I actually never use a thesaurus at all.  If a word isn&#039;t in my head, I&#039;m not sure I want it in my writing, you know?  (Big generalization, but...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like you, I don&#8217;t worry so much about whether Google has completely sliced, diced and cross-indexed me.  Perhaps when I&#8217;m blogging regularly for <a href="/./humans-at-work/" rel="nofollow">Humans At Work</a> I&#8217;ll worry more about it.  Or maybe not (grin).</p>
<p>I use online reference tools more and more these days, but if I want a deep look into a particular word, for example, I&#8217;ll always go first to Nicola&#8217;s Oxford English Dictionary.  I actually never use a thesaurus at all.  If a word isn&#8217;t in my head, I&#8217;m not sure I want it in my writing, you know?  (Big generalization, but&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rhbee1</title>
		<link>http://www.kelleyeskridge.com/knowing-where-to-find-it/comment-page-1/#comment-6032</link>
		<dc:creator>rhbee1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kelleyeskridge.com/?p=768#comment-6032</guid>
		<description>Since we are on the net and blogging, I wonder what you have to say about &quot;keywords&quot; and the SEO approach to putting it out there?

My own take is that I am saying what I want with as much accuracy and grace as I can gather at the time.  Trying to write and plugin the correct keywords, bold face, and underlines so a bot from Google or wherever can &quot;read&quot;  and then note my thoughts is anti-writing to me.

So in that sense is the use of a thesaurus though from time to time I do pick up my dust paperback Roget.

And of course, we have all noted the recent problem Mr. McSame had via his Georgia comments.  

Being on the net and having Google right there to aid in the research is addictive.  I use it but make sure I thoroughly digest the information and if possible cross-reference it before spitting it out as my own pap.

As for the reference tools your blog pointed me toward, I found it interesting that she preferred the book to the online versions.  But then so do I.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since we are on the net and blogging, I wonder what you have to say about &#8220;keywords&#8221; and the SEO approach to putting it out there?</p>
<p>My own take is that I am saying what I want with as much accuracy and grace as I can gather at the time.  Trying to write and plugin the correct keywords, bold face, and underlines so a bot from Google or wherever can &#8220;read&#8221;  and then note my thoughts is anti-writing to me.</p>
<p>So in that sense is the use of a thesaurus though from time to time I do pick up my dust paperback Roget.</p>
<p>And of course, we have all noted the recent problem Mr. McSame had via his Georgia comments.  </p>
<p>Being on the net and having Google right there to aid in the research is addictive.  I use it but make sure I thoroughly digest the information and if possible cross-reference it before spitting it out as my own pap.</p>
<p>As for the reference tools your blog pointed me toward, I found it interesting that she preferred the book to the online versions.  But then so do I.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
